Relevancy of Change

Other Gen-Xers and I have been stereotyped as not accepting labels, yet everyone goes through points in time when the labels that they once accepted as a part of their lives become superfluous. Perhaps, this has happened more often for Generation X. 

We are known for being the generation that were latch-key kids. We, in some ways, raised ourselves or, as I see it, had nearly limitless options for our own unsupervised time. After my high school day was completed, I had choices to make for my time and a key to a house to use. It was up to me as to how I wanted and when I wanted to use both of those options. This kind of upbringing provides for a plethora of wonderful things. Several of those are: 1. I decide how to use my own time, 2. I choose people more individually, 3. I create space for what I want to do, 4. I say no, and 5. I expect privacy and boundaries. 

Because I didn't have a highly supervised experience while I was younger, I was feer to accept the labels that I thought fit me as a person at the time or reject the ones that I have found to be irrelevant. For example, for a long time, I understood myself as a "student." Now, I, still learning and even if I went back to a university for more education, wouldn't need the label. I don't understand myself this way; I find "student" to be what being alive is, so the label is irrelevant. To state student is to also at some point state an inherent humanness. There just isn't a need for the label from my point of view. Why then continue to hold on to the label as though it were treasure pealed from a Cambell's soup can to turn in for class points?

Identity work has a lot of labels involved in it. In my late 20s, I chose to place myself in therapy and completed a lot of identity work. I started removing labels that people placed on me much earlier in life long before that, but because I did, I seemed to be unfit to be in the world around those who had their labels, stuck to them, and had needed them to be valid for everyone. Like every generation, Gen X is between two other generations who need their identity and labels for them. The Boomers had their lives figured out and the Millenials had their grandparents, parents, and siblings to affirm the labels they were giving to one another. Meanwhile, I, a single Gen Xer, kept removing mine as do most Gen Xers still today. It seems that we tolerate the labels needed to appease those around us from time to time, but for the most part, I and others have resolved to be in our own lives to the removal of labels. 

My own key, when I was younger, meant that I had my own responsibility to get what I needed to be done at school (which was also a place of employment for me) and home when I was available to get it done. Usually there was a timeframe; however, timing was still my choice. I, fortunately for my father, am an introvert, so I didn't really get into trouble. I went home. I was an honors student and in the band, so I had practice, homework, and a job. I didn't have a lot of pressure to get things done for someone else's expectation or on someone else's incessant timeline. I've always worked within those but not to the detriment of my freedom of choice. My choices were limited; however, I could have still pretty much chosen to do whatever I wanted with my life. I didn't need to achieve anything for anyone else. I had enough ambition and self-motivation not to need someone else's. I didn't have the label to look up to or bestowed on me such that I needed to have.

I don't have the label -- veteran. I don't have a parental label or an espoused one. I have my name. I know what I've done in my life, but as far as Self labels, I don't need them other than to appease another person's curiosity. I think in terms of what I am doing. In my identity work, I challenged a lot of the labels that were placed on me and exchanged all of them at one point for Child of God. It's the only one that I really think that I need to have. In the past year, my LGBTQ+ label has been in great demand to be explained and confessed as though I were living in sin and hiding my reality. 

I don't have the same experience that most have with this part of life or that most people seem to extort about this part of life. I've only ever needed the label because someone else needed it for themselves. I don't really need the label. I know who I am and what I am atrtracted to and how that has changed over time. As most will tell you, things change over time. My need to have a label for other people hasn't changed. I wish it had changed, but the need to be labeled creates a pidgeon-hole effect. I don't have the need to be "trans," "gay," "pan," "poly," "boi," etc. For most of my life, I haven't labeled. I just used queer for a long time. Creating subcategories and understandings beyond queer has caused division and dissension. I'm going back to just Child of God with my own key and my own timeline to get what I choose to do done, whether other people want that to be that way or not. 

I would rather just be than fit in to be.

Helping the Blind

Sitting in an online classroom or a Zoom room behind a black box or a completely blackened screen is not conducting a blind observation. It's ghoulish to pop in all of a sudden to make sure that the person knows that you are there just to make sure the person knows that you can show up at any point in time. To prove that the professor or speaker has absolutely no control over another's presence is not a blind observation. It's arrogance.

Power games are important to a lot of people. Surprising presenters or showing up to be confrontational is one way that people like to play with power. Unfortunately, this kind of power play has become the norm for online teaching and learning in a way that people are not able to effectively succeed at either. The game online is that the class sessions are recorded. Often, the recording wins -- not the people. 

Human beings are not meant to play power games. People are meant to work with one another in community instead of working with power beyond our control. We are asked to live in grace and not in human power gains. While there isn't anything wrong with success, how we get there needs to be within two realms: sanity and humanity. 

Sanity requests that we not bludgeon one another with rules. Most people are trained to think in "wrongs." We've been taught that two wrongs don't make a right when we weren't taught to look for what is already correct. We're conditioned to understand what is wrong. Sanity beckons us to learn to recognize and see what is right. What is correct? That depends.

Humanity requests that we use our sanity and not give in to the powers and principalities beyond ourselves such that we think we can have magical carpet rides instead of giving freedom to our souls to experience humanness. Humanity wants sanity. Christians have the great inherent excuse of the Fall in the Garden of Eden. "The Woman!" we can cry out to say that humanity has fallen from grace. Why are we still falling?

Between sanity and humanity, we have grace. Mercy! We have grace. We have the choice not to sit behind our technological screens blasting at those on the other side. We have the choice not to surprise and hide behind power that really isn't our own. 

We will have days online when people won't speak, use their cameras, or even use a name other than iPhone. They don't know, so you won't know. But some days, none of us will fight with power that we don't have and can't control. 

Some days are wonderful. People remain in community with one another online. Success can be had, and people are able to move on with their lives knowing that they have done the very best that they could have done. We will be able to see the power in the darkness before it is even there. We will know that it isn't the worst day or experience that it could be. Those days will let us see our human-ness. We won't need to find fault to see what is meet and right so to do. 

Our communal eyes will see mercy!

Public Persecution -- The Power of Should

We live in a world of values: both collective and individual.  I may not value what the rest of my community values and still have the the responsibility to know my my own values are. Should is not ever an agreement.  What I think I should do and what I think others should do is not an agreement for action.  There are communal shoulds that replace those of the individual from time to time.

When in a conversation, even an observation for work or a therapy session, if a person starts stating illnesses and states that medication is needed.  Then,  the person says that "I need to get it;" it is rational to think that the person would need assistance.  It is not rational to think that the statement is an apology for perceived sin.  To think so would make the observer insane.  If the observer then begins to gossip with everyone about what the speaker has said when the person obviously needed help as private information is being divulged, then it situation turns into a direct actions for public humiliation.  It is obvious when someone needs help when they are divulging private information that the person would not ordinarily provide.  It is even more obvious when the person in need blatantly states it and starts talking about needing medication that was given to him or her for it.

In a paralleled conversation to one of my own, which is a personal narrative in the above scenario, is one of a diabetic.  If a diabetic goes into shock and needs his or her insulin or orange juice to help the situation and a person just observes the situation, then the observer is engaging in murder, especially if the observer thinks that the diabetic owes him or her and apology.  This is the plight inherent in the current medical community.  Should I or should I not help certain kinds of people? 

People have a civic responsibility in America not to murder another person or to stand idly by when another is blatantly murdered.  A cry for help or assistance for help is not the one asking "hitting rock bottom."  It is the observer that risks jail, institutions, and death.  Public statement of help when another looks idly by is a kin to having a video of ruthless police officers beating or murdering another citizen and saying "see if that person had only apologized this wouldn't have happened."  In this case, the observer is sociopathic or so arrogant that he or she requires detainment for the illness or crime that has been committed.

When I say that people should know about something, it is not an agreement for my own public humiliation as though I were repenting for asking for help or my own illness.  I have never apologized for an illness or for the effects of an illness.  I don't expect that I will in the future either.  I don't run around telling others that they need to apologize to me for their illnesses.  I expect that if someone asks for help in a situation that I will work to do what I can to help another person; it may even be a response prompting to get the person's medication.

Should is a values word and not agreement for informational dissemination.  The spreading of data or public use of data that so obviously is a cry for help is a form of stalking.  It is, in fact, cyber-stalking.  If it is done in an attempt to remove the person from employment, then the issue is one of dehumanizing enslavement.  The tattling of another is criminal and mainly exposes the hatred of the observer.  It shows that person's arrogance, lack of compassion, and merciless interaction with other people in the world. 

The power of should is in the justice system of the United States.  It is in the hands of the citizens to help those whom have be publicly persecuted by adults tattling on others under the guise of "the greater good."  It is, indeed, unethical to disseminate personal points of view as fact as the facts don't change reality.  One may think that a fact about another person's medical history is one of public concern.  Usually, it is when taken out of context, broken into sound bites, and claimed a speaker has done something that they haven't actually done or said

I will state again.  I don't apologize to those who demand an apology.  If someone thinks that I or anyone has apologized for some perceived misdeed, then it is the listener or the observer who has decided in that person's heart and mind that he or she is owed an apology.  No one is owed an apology.  I don't think I should.  So, I don't.  Even those who murder others in this society are not required to apologize.  I may think that they should; however, they don't have to.  To claim one it's real and is similar to looting another person's freedom.  The person spreading around mal-attained recordings and documentation belonging to another person is liable, especially when it is an attempt to harm the speaker intentionally. 

Ultimately, haters will hate.  However, they are prosecutable; I think they should be prosecuted.  Those whom turn in other people for committing crimes that they have never done should be arrested for the false accusation.  When the police are called or involved, it has immediately become, at very least, a civil issue for the courts.  If someone decides to call the police because he or she knows that another person doesn't have car insurance, which is not a part of that person's position at a body shop, then the individual who made the call should be arrested.  Tattling, and being wrong, is at very least a civil suit. 

Trying to teach someone else humility through humiliation is criminal.  Perhaps, people should think about it before illegally attaining information and spreading it around. 

Unreachable Replacements: An Apology

"Illogical, Captain," spoke Spock in almost every, if not every, episode of the original Star Trek.  While the world is still grieving the recently deceased, Ravi Zacharias, Apologetics has been at the forefront of Christianity's mind.  Apologetics, the reasoned argumentation or justification of a theory, especially religious doctrine, is the responsibility of every believer.  Every single Christian is called upon at some point to defend that person's faith. 

Apologetics and science is not my strong point and will probably never be.  Science is a wonderful field of study and incredibly helpful.  Some people need to know how the universe began, why the dinosaurs are gone, and how the earth sustains all of God's creatures.  I tend to think, "I don't need to know all that."  The need to explain how the Spirit of God volcanically erupts and flows around the land faster than light eludes me.  I accept and experience it out of a relationship with the Helper and Healer God I believe in; however, the view that Replacement Theologians claim that Jesus' crucifixion replaces all other views and understandings in the world is a place that orthodox (right believing and right practicing) Christians should defend against.  It is more logical for me to do so. 

Minimally, other than forgiveness of all sin and salvation for believers, the resurrection of Christ has not replaced all other understandings or worldviews with Christianity.  The beauty of being in the remnant post-resurrection is that we have the Helper (John 14:26) with us as a full replacement has not happened.  Had a replacement of the worldviews taken place, then there would not be any unreached people groups.  The Great Commission (Matt. 28:18-20) would have not ever taken place.

Scripture leaves Christians with the understanding that Jesus knew He was to be crucified.  He chose to complete the journey as the sacrificial lamb for all sin for all eternity -- the sin debt paid in full.  The unblemished sheep and doves were no longer needed.  These had been replaced by the Blood of the Lamb -- Jesus.  However, even the Blood of Christ, the sacrifice of God the Father, did not replace the unreached people groups or their worldviews.  What I love about evangelism and apologetics is getting to share the love of God.  What I love about meeting people and taking part in the community is the love of God.

Many would say that I should love sharing the scriptures and trying to get people to convert to mainstream Christianity wants people to move to.  I don't accept that the evangelist's job is to convert people.  The Helper does that.  It is the only way that that happens.  I have little desire to push someone towards Jesus or to tear them down.  God calls us all to Him.  I don't need to help with the restlessness; it just is.  Unfortunately, apologetics and evangelism are needed, contemporarily, more for professing believers than unreached groups. 

The only thing other than my kippah that I have been considered an apostate and asked to leave groups, even churches for, is my professed apologetic.  Once a Christian is a heretic to other professing believers that person has found a right relationship living in Christ.  God is well served when we praise what He has done in or lives and the relationships that we have been given. 

Without our relationships, we would not be sharpened into the believers that God would like Christians to be.  I am able to embrace my German-ness, my Irish-ness, my border-ness, and my Jewishness because I have loved Ravi Zacharias' Indian-ness.  His belief and love for God was brought through India.  He never left it out.  It is what I loved first about him as I was struggling, and still do from time to time, with my Jewishness.  It was so ingrained in me that even Paul left his Jewishness behind, which he did not.  I love my "ness-es" just as Ravi loved his that our loving God gave him. 

After his "nesses," I found apologetics for the first time.  We are blessed that other worldviews were not replaced.  That people are able to converse about, defend, and embrace for what it is -- a  relationship with a loving God.  The Church Militant -- the prayer warriors -- are all evangelists and apologists.  It may seem that worldviews have been replaced in contemporary theology.  The extreme sides of both liberal and conservative theology seem to accept the replacement in agreement with one another finally on something, except Scripture.       

The resurrection of Christ doesn't replace worldviews.  The Great Commission works on it.  However, the Helper left to guide and guard us in and around the world professing faith, welcoming believers, and reviving those in the Body is what heals and replaces the harm done in the world by those who haven't accepted the peace of God.  The moment of salvation is not the last moment of belief; it is the first.  Still, even with the loss of a great evangelist, apologist, and gratefully praise-filled Child of God -- dear Ravi -- the Helper is still here to guide and guard as we go into the world just as he did.  To "stand on the shoulders" of the ones who came before us as we have been prompted to do. 

I have envisioned the homecoming of Dr. Zacharias.  I hope that I will be greeted with the same "well done, my good and faithful servant," and be able to tell God that even with the work I've done, the souls that I've helped, and the love of God that I have been able to share that I am most thankful for my time in His presence with praise -- that I stood on the shoulders of those who came before me and spent time "helping thinkers to believe and believers to think."  I  believe Dr. Ravi flew into Glory with a winged beaming light and praise from Christ while wanting to have done more for people here.  Praise God for Dr. Ravi Zacharias; his memory will be for a blessing to all of us.   

Picking Lives: Serving vs. Slavery

More and more people are beginning to serve more than in other places.  All of a sudden, during this pandemic, people are more focused on communities around them instead of themselves as they have had time to think about the community time that they are not receiving.  It's been difficult to be removed from people within the places that we frequent.  As places open up again, it seems that the daily grind will continue again.  However,  it will not be the same.  The question is: what will have been replaced?

Sometimes, it seems as though the need for one person or companies to replace individual rights with whatever they want is paramount to the actual contracts that they hold.  The Torah is God's contract with the people.  A marital certificate is a contract between the two people.  Renters have a contract with a company or landlord to agree upon the ways that the two parties will interact with one another.  Everything from entry into the apartment, use of utilities, maintenance, conditions upon leaving, and pest control are all a part of the contract as are break lease fees.  The terms and length of the contract are a part of the agreement.  If it is not in the contract, then it cannot be done by either party without liability.  If a tenant damages the apartment, then the tenant is liable.  If the landlords or companies don't provide the services, including notice before entry or adding people to the entry is a cloak and dagger fashion, then the landlord is also liable for that.

Services have to be provided according to the contract.  If the rent is not collected, most landlords are not slow to begin an eviction process.  Stipulations for late rent are often included in the terms of the lease.  Even if a tenant is late with rent and pays the fees, then the rent is still paid and services still have to be rendered, regardless of the emotional involvement of the staff or leadership in the company.  Rental agreements are not one-sided; the tenant is not automatically at fault.  Attempting to remove a tenant by creating a hostile environment by not rendering services creates a liability for the company as the contract is for a specific length of time.  The company can sue for the breach of contract and the tenant can file a countersuit, even if the employees don't like it. 

Likewise, sin does not cancel out God's covenants with the people.  The Torah is an agreement.  Once it is received, then it is binding.  For Christians, once the person accepts Jesus as Lord, then that relationship is also binding.  God doesn't get to ditch the people.  God is always there, even if the person are wrong.  Conversation can take place.  Things can be reconciled.  However, the covenants are not removed from the relationship.  God has not been replaced by the pandemic.  Work positions may have been replaced, but human freedoms have not been replaced.  The pandemic does not replace the country's responsibility to care for the people.

It is one thing to chose to serve other people at this point in time, to include donating blood or plasma, making masks, continuing to deliver food and goods, continuing to work in medical environments, or having switched over to online teaching environments, has taken on a different civic service awareness to the global populace.  Those whom have price gouged, to include refusing to fixed apartments and refuse to wear masks (others' lives have a price), are refusing civic responsibility and the ability to save lives.  Even though God freed the slaves, Christ freed people's sin debts, and allowed for captivity to happen, the attempt to enslave is unethical and immoral.

I don't adhere to a theology of predestination.  While others think that I am Israeli because I accept my Hebrew lineage, I am an American.  I have not received dual citizenship and haven't removed my rights as an American.  Those, recently, whom have decided that I have to adhere to Israeli law in the United States, are greatly mistaken.  I don't even know Israeli law.  I have no idea.  I had no idea that they spend their time dickering for everything until it was just mentioned by someone (several someones) else.  The second someone serving of his or her own accord is required to do that for free by anyone, enslavement is at hand.  Choosing to pick another's life is not a call to service; it is an attempt at enslavement.  Contrary to popular belief, God does not force anyone to do anything.  The situation may be unbearable to a person; however, it is still a choice to adhere to God's exit from it.

We have a duty and a right to stand against slavery.  It is quite simple if someone is required to give or be punished in any way, then it isn't service that is being asked for.  It is enslavement that is required.  There are covenants between companies and individuals for a lot of things.  Companies, like religious institutions and non-profit organizations, and individuals like to get what they want without cost.  We like freebies, including people lives.  So, remember that sound bites can be played in full in court.  Splicing sound can be found out.  Demanding the services from another without pay with not free offerings or service.  When people cannot give or not give freely without a form of sanction or punishment, slavery is at hand.  Those whom work to stand against it are the believing patriots that the country and the world need to have.  Slavery is not an appropriate replacement for service.  Standing against slavery is heroism.

Heartstrings: The Work of Guardian Angels

The quarantine and the restarting American society has been pulling at the heartstrings of the populace.  During a point in time when society is working on trusting one another again, it seems that guardian angels are needed more now than before.  Some people may understand guardian angels as the same as Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, or the Tooth Fairy.  I fully accept the existence of guardian angels.  As my life has progressed, I have grown more resilient which I attribute to my guardian angel.  I would not be able to fully address the things that I have lived through regardless of what other people have thought about them.

People are created to trust other people.  We are designed innately to work with one another and to work with what we have been given by God.  When life pulls at our heartstrings, it is with the help of our guardian angels that we can be stabilized or even comforted a bit.  Whether someone wants to attribute this comfort and understanding as the Spirit of God or not is that person's decision; however, our guardian angels keep us company in life.  Angels are charged with being messengers and guardian angels are charged with God's message of protection for the individual and the Kingdom.

Our guardian angels help to remind us that when we were created God's intention was to pour out all of His blessings and riches upon us such that we would have prosperous, long lives.  He wanted people to to know and enjoy beauty, to be strong, to live in wisdom, to embrace pleasure, and to be honored and live honorably.  This Loving Creator wanted the best for His creation.  The very best to Him was a relationship with Him.  Some people like acts of service, words of affirmation, physical touch, or receiving gifts much more than quality time.  A relationship with God -- what concerned Him the most during the imago dei creation process, was loving interaction with His newly formed people.  God's love language is quality time.

During this tumultuous time of Covid-19, people have lost material things while others have stood around spouting that they should have saved, prevented, being willing to lose these things for God's plan, or even that they are learning to be grateful for those creature comforts like -- shelter, food, and clothing, safety, and employment.  Some relationships have been torn apart over smaller things than the Covid-19 pandemic, but this was not what God intended life to be.  He mourned the possible loss of a relationship with his creation and refrained providing secure rest to us.  He wanted us to be designed to need Him.  If we did not need God, then we would not seek Him at all while finding contentment in the things that we have and not in the Creator that provided them.

We were given the ability to be blessed with riches beyond imagination yet weariness for what really fulfills our souls.  Comfort within our daily lives while still living points of mundane activity.  We have blessings with agitation and anxiety during times of turmoil.  We have our humanity with which we embrace the divine.  People are designed this way such that neither God nor the people lose the most precious jewel of all --  a relationship with God.

In this relationship, God's guardians help us to have what we need for our own protection.  They are the messengers of God's protection.  Perhaps, a person at work likes to play power games in Zoom meetings and outside of the meeting, you receive an email accepting responsibility for the error on the other side and not your own without the knowledge of the others.  This is the guardian.  Perhaps, a leader wants to manipulate a situation in the person's favor and evidence is found of the manipulation.  This is the guardian at work.  Perhaps, someone wants the house and car you own, so there is an attempt to economically dis-empower your family leading to the termination of the individual due to EOE violations.  This is the guardian at work.  When people try to punish you through forms of public humiliation and demean the divine spark within all of us, their deceit is found out through investigations.  This is the guardian's protection -- the bringer of the shelter of peace and not creating human puppets through enslavement.

Often, the problems of another towards you can be minimized by others stating that is the Evil One causing it to excuse the works of those in a hierarchy or in the name of safety -- the safety of social manipulation.  The Evil One -- nor the demon liquor -- didn't cause others to chose the way that they did.  The desires of their hearts did.  The desire of God's heart is for the protection of His people, so we were given the blessing of the angels -- the bearers of Good News. 

We are pulled around by both good and evil.  Since we have been prohibited from inner rest and regardless of material or character possessions, we are drawn into a relationship with God and one another.  A hedge of protection or a shelter of peace raised over us to guard and guide from those around us intent upon personal gain and the wealth of their own power gives us another reason to live in the warmth and love of God.  Allow it to be wrapped around you as it is done to me through the guardians of peace. 

Power-full Life

While we are living through the COVID-19 pandemic, my life hasn't changed all that much.  I miss seeing the people in the markets, my students, and faith communities.  I am concerned about my doctors as they treat this disease and am concerned about patients in hospitals in need of physicians and staff who are unbiased enough to actually help them without extraneous harm.  I have noticed that I have learned more about my doctors in the past few years; this has caused me to be more concerned for them which has been wonderful.  I had a lovely Jewish woman and now a younger Asian man -- both primary care osteopaths.  She was at least two kinds of minorities, and he is at least one.  These concerns, in combination with my own minorities, have caused me to question everyone's safety in medical environments in the past several years.

In all of this mess, people are striving to help those around them, some are exhausted, and some are not striving so much.  The power exchange within the pandemic is fascinating to me, especially since I am in a population of people with specific advanced care instructions for current and "decision-assisted" care. Not only have I limited care that I am willing to receive, but I have limited the providers and added criterion for providers from whom are allowed to be involved in the decision making process.  While some have seen the restrictions to be overpowering and a result of disobedient control, my medical practitioners and I learned that without them people punish me in hospitals, that people will show up where I work for "social observation," and that regardless of what happens, I won't receive the level of care that others receive, even from well-meaning average skilled people.  I had to build in legal protections for current care into my advanced directive just like other other minorities have had to do in the world. 

How many of those directives are being ignored during this pandemic?  Many will say that dying people can't choose at this point in time who they are getting for providers.  Are some dying because they are not receiving the same care as others with COVID-19?  Unfortunately, this will be someone's narrative.  This is a time when people are negating requests and patient's rights about clergy visiting rooms or bedsides to pray with and/or evangelize patients.  Would my removal of clergy from my healthcare be upheld at this time?  Would chaplains show up claiming that they have the right because they are trained to do so?  Or because this is the crisis to confess, repent, and accept another's point of view before I died?  It is this very claim to power that prompted me to remove them from that activity.  I don't believe in that religious power use. 

Power is powerful.  A domination use of animals has caused them to be contaminated and fed to human beings, which is why we are now quarantined and using social distancing from one another.  Dominating animals caused the domination of the global community.  What humans have created with domination could have been prevented with dominion.  The same power of creation forms functional human relationships.  It is more than a matter of mindset, respect, and perception.  Before a person can even even set an intention for any activity at all, it has to be in the heart of the person to do.  Perception is based in education and not in the heart.  Heart-work changes the rest of the person and not the other way around.  The heart seeks power more than any other part of a human being. 

Our world is full of power to be had.  Everyone has power to choose what he or she would like to do.  Choosing to use power to help keep society full of life and creativity is a good use of it.  Choosing to share with one another instead of forcing submission to others is a far better way to live.  May this time of continued quarantine and separation cause us to value the choice we have to use our power to uphold one another.  During this quarantine, let us not dominate one another as the economy and disease has done.  Giving to one another creates dominion; it upholds life.  It creates respect and honors the holy spark within each one of us.  Give space for the holy within what we might understand to be mundane.  Let us be a people who give life as it is difficult to have a life full of power to affect the globe.